2008 Dodge Ram vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (238 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2008 Dodge Ram. (215 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2008 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Ram weights approximately 217 kg more than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (422 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Dodge Ram. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Ram | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Falcon |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 422 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2830 mm |