2008 Dodge Ram vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Dodge Ram. (510 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Ram | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | XU 6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |