2008 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Ram (310 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (211 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Ram (447 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Ram | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Raider |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 83 L |