2008 Ferrari 360 vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Ferrari 360 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ferrari 360 (373 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ferrari 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ferrari 360 | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ferrari | Jeep |
Model | 360 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3586 cc | 3704 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 370 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 370 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 78 L |