2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1952 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 55 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.

Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Fiat Bravo 1952 Jaguar XK
Make Fiat Jaguar
Model Bravo XK
Year Released 2008 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1368 cc 3441 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 158 HP
Torque 206 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 2250 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 106 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 212 km/hour 201 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1350 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 63 L