2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1953 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 55 kg more than 1953 Jaguar XK.
Because 1953 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar XK (291 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1953 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
Model | Bravo | XK |
Year Released | 2008 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 3442 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 63 L |