2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 800 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Bravo | 16 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2260 mm |