2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
Model | Bravo | Tempest |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 5341 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2930 mm |