2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 535 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Fiat Bravo | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Bravo | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2290 mm |
