2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,368 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 775 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Fiat | Seat |
Model | Bravo | 600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |