2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Fiat | Plymouth |
Model | Bravo | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2555 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2630 mm |