2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 54 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Bravo | CJ |
Year Released | 2008 | 1985 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2380 mm |