2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1988 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 120 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1988 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Nissan Cedric. (173 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1988 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Bravo | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2793 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2740 mm |