2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 41 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Bravo | Sigma |
Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2730 mm |