2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 740 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Bravo | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 3947 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 93 L |