2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1996 Fiat Scudo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Scudo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Scudo would be higher. At 1,579 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Scudo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 315 kg more than 1996 Fiat Scudo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Scudo. (125 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Scudo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1996 Fiat Scudo | |
Make | Fiat | Fiat |
Model | Bravo | Scudo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1579 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 78 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |