2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1998 Ford Puma
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 340 kg more than 1998 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1998 Ford Puma | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Bravo | Puma |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 42 L |