2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 1998 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1998 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 1998 Rover 200 | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Bravo | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1396 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2510 mm |