2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 2001 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,543 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 57 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercury Cougar (228 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2001 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 2001 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Bravo | Cougar |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2543 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 196 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 58 L |