2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,368 cc, 2008 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 610 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Fiat Bravo | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | Bravo | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1368 cc | 599 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 1810 mm |
