2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 963 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Fiat Bravo | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Fiat | Toyota |
| Model | Bravo | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1368 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 99 L |
