2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Bravo (118 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Bravo | Pixo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2360 mm |