2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2008 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 2008 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Bravo | Colorado |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |