2008 Fiat Bravo vs. 2012 Kia Venga
To start off, 2012 Kia Venga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Venga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Venga weights approximately 360 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Venga (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Venga will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Bravo | 2012 Kia Venga | |
Make | Fiat | Kia |
Model | Bravo | Venga |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1396 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 17:01 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.5 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1710 kg |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 48 L |