2008 Fiat Croma vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Croma (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Croma weights approximately 602 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Croma | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Croma | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |