2008 Fiat Croma vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Croma (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Croma weights approximately 285 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Croma (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Croma | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | Croma | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |