2008 Fiat Croma vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Croma weights approximately 556 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Because 1979 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Croma | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Croma | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |