2008 Fiat Croma vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Croma. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Croma (320 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2008 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2008 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2008 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Croma | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Croma | FTO |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1300 mm |