2008 Fiat Palio vs. 1964 Rover P6
To start off, 2008 Fiat Palio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Rover P6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Rover P6 (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Palio. (102 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1964 Rover P6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Palio | 1964 Rover P6 | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Palio | P6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1241 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.8 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.9 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 54 L |