2008 Fiat Palio vs. 2010 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2010 Mazda B4000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Fiat Palio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Fiat Palio would be higher. At 4,034 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Fiat Palio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Palio. (102 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Palio | 2010 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Palio | B4000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1241 cc | 4034 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 74 L |