2008 Fiat Panda vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Fiat Panda is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Panda. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 355 kg more than 2008 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Panda (180 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2008 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Fiat Panda | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Panda | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1248 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |
