2008 Fiat Stilo vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2008 Fiat Stilo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2008 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Stilo | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Stilo | 145 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |