2008 Fiat Stilo vs. 1991 Plymouth Colt

To start off, 2008 Fiat Stilo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Plymouth Colt (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Stilo. (68 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 70 kg more than 2008 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Plymouth Colt (184 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Stilo.

Compare all specifications: