2008 Fiat Stilo vs. 1993 Rover 800
To start off, 2008 Fiat Stilo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Rover 800 weights approximately 259 kg more than 2008 Fiat Stilo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 800 (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Stilo. (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Rover 800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Stilo | 1993 Rover 800 | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Stilo | 800 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |