2008 Ford Bantam vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2008 Ford Bantam is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Bantam. 1967 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Bantam has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Bantam will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Bantam | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Ford | NSU |
Model | Bantam | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |