2008 Ford Bantam vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2008 Ford Bantam is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 105 kg more than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Ascona (131 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Bantam | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Bantam | Ascona |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 40 L |