2008 Ford Bantam vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Ford Bantam is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 60 kg more than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (146 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Bantam | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Bantam | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 84.8 mm |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 10 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |