2008 Ford Bantam vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Ford Bantam is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 455 kg more than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Bantam | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Bantam | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |