2008 Ford E-150 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Ford E-150 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2008 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-150 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | E-150 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |