2008 Ford E-150 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2008 Ford E-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 268 kg more than 2008 Ford E-150.
Because 2008 Ford E-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford E-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-150 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | CU-X |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |