2008 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2008 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-150 (225 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 653 kg more than 2008 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-150 | 2005 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | E-150 | Canyon |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 72 L |