2008 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6
To start off, 2008 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (274 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2008 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-150 | 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | MazdaSpeed6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 274 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |