2008 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2008 Ford E-150. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-150 | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | E-150 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |