2008 Ford E-250 vs. 1985 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Ford E-250 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 446 more horse power than 2008 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford E-250 weights approximately 247 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford E-250 | 1985 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-250 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 6500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 671 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |
