2008 Ford E-350 vs. 1984 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2008 Ford E-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 373 kg more than 2008 Ford E-350.
Because 1984 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford E-350 | 1984 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | E-350 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5409 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2650 mm |
