2008 Ford E-350 vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2008 Ford E-350 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2008 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. 2008 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1987 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1987 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-350 | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-350 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2008 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2440 mm |