2008 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2008 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2008 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 723 kg more than 2008 Ford E-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford E-350 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-350 | F-Type |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2390 mm |