2008 Ford E-350 vs. 2006 Toyota Fortuner
To start off, 2008 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Fortuner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Fortuner would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Fortuner. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Fortuner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Fortuner weights approximately 279 kg more than 2008 Ford E-350.
Because 2006 Toyota Fortuner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Fortuner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Fortuner. (343 Nm). This means 2008 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Fortuner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford E-350 | 2006 Toyota Fortuner | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | E-350 | Fortuner |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5409 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |
