2008 Ford F-150 vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2008 Ford F-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2008 Ford F-150. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford F-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford F-150. (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford F-150 | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-150 | XJ |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 401 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 84 L |