2008 Ford F-150 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2008 Ford F-150 and 2008 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2008). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2008 Ford F-150. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford F-150.
Because 2008 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-150 (353 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2008 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford F-150 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-150 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
